Conservative Warrior

I just watched the Hannity on America special. I gotta say, I loved it. What a relief not to have Colmes constantly nagging away with his snide remarks, and blatant lies. I mean last week he had the balls to say Bill Clinton passed the tax reform bills in the 90’s IN FRONT OF NEWT GINGRICH, the man who AUTHORED the legislation. It’s sad to see the left hard at work rewriting history within a decade, one can only imagine what they’ve changed from the past.

Back to topic, I think Fox, if they are paying attention, will notice an increase in viewers when Hannity is by himself. I think this is a move to test the waters to see if they can gain back all the conservative viewers who have left Fox News to watch Glenn Beck, like me. For me, Glenn Beck is my favorite news host, but in a different way, I view him as more of an entertaining conservative. Whereas Hannity is more of a tough-guy strong conservative. Granted I they were running a re-run of Glenn Beck I had already seen during the Hannity special, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that I watched Hannity on America.

I gotta admit, if they put Hannity on weekdays by himself, I’d be split watching Glenn Beck or Hannity during the 8 central slot. Probably flip back and forth, 50/50. Really split on it. It’ll depend on who’s the guest or what they are talking about. But with Colmes sitting there with his annoying lies, kinda depresses me, feels like all the good Hannity is saying is being corrupted by the filth propaganda out of Colmes. They could ATLEAST switch Colmes out with Bob Beckel, atleast Beckel admits the truth now and then. I could tolerate Beckel, and I know they are figuring that out, they keep putting him in as a replacement; good move, Fox.

It’s funny, in my opinion, I think Fox has always pretended to be conservative, or atleast moderate, to gain conservative viewers. Rupert is still the typical hollywood jew (I mean no disrespect to my jewish friends), Rupert even fundraises for Hillary Clinton. I think Fox has HURT conservatives more than helped because then Clinton goes and whines to KNOWN liberal Wallace, that he and Fox are a part of a right wing conspiracy to get him. It gives republicans a little comfort that takes away their vocal edge, and gives democrats the “well you have Fox” argument when talking about media bias.

That’s all changed, with the newest biggest newscaster on TV, Glenn Beck, who has THREE slots on CNN’s Headline News, at 6pm, 8pm, and again at 11pm. Glenn Beck is a REAL conservative, who says it like it is. He exposes the muslim extremism in our mist, the liberal appeasers, and all the hideous truths. Now, from hearing Hannity on talk radio, I know Hannity knows about all the same stuff, yet on Fox News, it’s like he’s restrained. For instance, in an interview with Howard Stern, a while back, they were talking about the Iraq War and how there were no WMD, and he kinda quickly and softly murmured out that he thinks they were shipped to Ba’ath Syria, which borders Ba’ath Iraq, yet he wouldn’t speak up about it, and he never mentioned it again on the show. It’s like he’d been told NOT to say that.

Anyways, it looks like Fox may be making moves to capture back their conservative viewership from the Glenn Beck phenomenon, and if so, I have a big piece of advice: Stop restraining Hannity, let him talk about unpolitically correct things, like that Syria took the WMD, and get rid of Colmes, either replace him with Beckel, or give Sean his own show!

Technorati Tags: Fox News, Syria, WMD, Hannity, Sean Hannity, Colmes, Beckel, conservatives, Glenn Beck, CNN, Newt Gingrich, taxes

I had the WEIRDEST, plausible dream last night. One of the weirdest things. I just want to put it down here so if it actually becomes true, I can point back to this is atleast a minor form of proof.

So here’s what happens about my dream:

I saw a mushroom cloud, chaos, assumably dc hit.

I saw a TV, and on it, was an old guy, don’t know who he is, and I read Railroad Commission off it, and I saw next to him Pat Buchanan of all people who appeared to have a leadership role, and was consoling the nation, and some sort of volunteer defense force took part. It seemed like the nation trusted him, because he basically said this would happen.

Anyways, trust me I don’t like his racism, I date an asian, and I disagree on a lot like Iraq, so I wouldn’t really like to see it happen. Kind of lukewarm on it myself. Kinda weird. Pat Buchanan.. Haha. Could be, or heck PROBABLY is just a quack dream. It just was so odd. I went and researched the railroad commission, which I didn’t even know hardly anything about. Apparently they’re NOT in the line of succession, so sigh a relief. However, The Continuity of Government report DID suggest getting rid of legislative members in the line of succession, which is unconstitutional and also so, say a nancy pelosi speaker can’t just assasinate or impeach bush and cheney to take power, could pose a problem. They DID suggest adding essentially only presidential appointees LIKE the railroad commission. So who knows? Odd. Just odd. Just wanted to put it out there.

Technorati Tags: Buchanan, Pat Buchanan, Reform Party, Politics, News, Railroad Commission, Bush, Cheney, Continuity of Government

Remember the 2004 elections? Almost ALL democrats were predicting a LANDSLIDE for Kerry. When in fact, it was practically almost a landslide for bush.

The Gadflyer predicts Kerry landslide

Discourse.net predicts a Kerry landslide

Washington Monthly predicts a Kerry landslide

The list goes on and on: indyweek, pretty much 80% of liberal bloggers, CNN, You get the idea. Most major media outlets were predicting a significant victory for kerry. Turned out to be a significant defeat.

First things first, many, many of those polls are taken on say, CNN’s website, where their liberal viewers will OF COURSE say kerry would win, etc. I’ve seen some political polls talking about this 2006 election cited on national television by CNN that had only 450 people who took it. 450 people, and they think that’s a valid representation? Even their 7% margin of error isn’t enough.

It’s just ridiculous. Even if you did take their grossly inflated numbers. There’s two big things left out: 1) Republicans have a higher turn out rate in mid-terms, due to better education most likely. 2) Bush’s approval rating dived from about 60% to 40% because of REPUBLICANS who left him when Bush supported Amnesty. Bush’s poll numbers actually went UP with democrats, from 9% to 11%, but with republicans went down from near 80’s to 50’s. Bush’s low approval is from illegal immigration.

Heck, if I took an approval rating poll, I’d mark “DISAPPROVE” of Bush. Yet, I sure as hell would never vote for a democrat, and I’m voting in republicans at home, abstaining on the gubernatorial because Perry is sissy on border control, and there’s a hope Kinky might be crazy enough to actually keep his promise to send 10,000 guard to the border. But you get the idea, voting in conservatives, but I would disapprove of Bush, partially cuz Bush is a liberal in republican’s clothing.

I mean, I remember when Bush said in 2000, against Clinton’s bosnian idiocy, “Out troops shouldn’t be used for nation-building”, yet lo and behold he’s building up Iraq! Why train Muslims? They are just going to come back to kill us. If a big conflict breaks out between Israel and Arabs (as it will) I guarantee the very Iraq army we train would fight Israel. Then to add insult to injury, he supports the mexican invasion of our country to the south. Then to make it worse, he has crazy socialist medicare proposals, actually WORSE than Al Gore’s in 2000, and has REFUSED to veto the spending-crazy congress. Keep in mind that democrats love spending, as they are VOCALLY big government, republicans are just being disloyal to their values, whereas those same values democrats criticize, such as big spending, is THE democratic value. The sad irony is if you lower taxes, you LOSE tax revenue, because business growth slows down. To a point, you gain tax revenue from decreasing taxes, it would probably balance out around 15%. But lowering taxes at ANY point always increases industrial growth.

Technorati Tags: Money, Economy, Bush, Illegal Immigration, News, Politics, elections, lies, Congress, Democrats, Republicans

I’ve taken a look at his views. While many do disturb and upset me, I have come to an interesting conclusion:

I dislike his pro-gay viewpoint.
I dislike his abortion viewpoint. (why is it a felony crime to kill a baby right when they leave the womb, but legal one minute earlier? NOTHING changed about the baby! Murder is murder!)
I dislike his pro-stemcell viewpoint.

What I do like about Kinky’s stances:

Illegal Immigration - as he promises to send 10,000 national guard to the border, whereas perry won’t even support a fence.

To shake up the government which means for me, the Republican party -The party needs a damn boot in the arse to stay loyal to their original values, like Newt Gingrich’s contract with America. As much as I HATE Nancy Pelosi, and democrats, it may seem masochistic even, but I think we have to stab ourselves to get the poison out of our system. We have to make the republican party know if they don’t stay loyal and DO AS WE VOTERS tell them, we’re VOTING INDEPENDENT, or if no GOOD alternative candidates are available, staying home.

In summation: I could never vote FOR a homosexual embracing, baby-murderer supporting, governor. I’m at odds because Perry isn’t doing enough on illegals and kinky does make big promises on the issue. And I don’t know what the hell Strayhorn is about. Her issues page is by far the most vague I’ve ever seen, it just says a “common sense conservative” but I don’t see any pro-gun, anti-illegal, or anything on there. I’ll probably avoid voting on the gubernatorial.
On a side note: Newt, please run. Someone lead this country. Bush won’t even protect our borders, nor will governors. Damn corporate interests.
If you do, I’ll put up millions. That’s a promise.

Technorati Tags: Kinky Friedman, Texas, Governor, Strayhorn, Rick Perry, Illegal Immigration, Newt Gingrich

We could stop this North Korea situation RIGHT now. I mean the american people suffer through free trade long enough that we should be able to use it’s benefits in a situation like this.

The chinese don’t work for the chinese. They work for the USA. USA-related jobs make up employment for atleast 100 million families. China’s problem is they HAVE to choose inaction all the time to NOT piss off anyone. They have a huge coup risk. If they piss of any 2% extremist minority, that’s 25 million people, enough to throw a coup.

We have to FORCE china to make a decision. We can threaten to put tarrifs on chinese imports (which would help our economy anyways if we did it slowly and gradually increasing). That would make China have to choose between pissing off 300 million workers, and going into depression, or the maybe 30 million die-hard communists. I think they would make the right choice.

Technorati Tags: UN, United Nations, sanctions, Bush, China, North Korea, DPRK, Kim Jong il, John Bolton

Relatively recently, though not in the news much, the International Islamic Front (IIF) for Jihad Against the Crusaders and the Jewish People issued this fatwah:

“Acting on behalf of the International Islamic Front (IIF) for Jihad Against the Crusaders and the Jewish People, which is headed by Osama bin Laden, the Markaz-ud-Dawa (MUD) of Pakistan, which is the political wing of the Lashkar-e-Toiba (LET), is reported to have issued a Fatwa calling upon the Muslims to kill Pope Benedict XVI for a recent speech of his delivered on September 12,2006, which has been projected as anti-Islam by Al Qaeda and other jihadi terrorist organisations of the world.”

Now the Pope has decided to visit Turkey, where one of the hottest selling books is a fiction story about killing the pope… Turkey, from where the former ottoman empire was based in Istanbul, or ancient Constantinople before muslim invaders conquered the european peoples there, is also being pressured by the muslim world to become the head of the new Muslim caliphate. A caliphate being the embodiment of Islam’s command to dominate the entire world. Islam means “submission” and all muslim countries are in the Dar Al-Islam “house of submission”, and all non-muslim countries are in the Dar Al-Harb, or “house of war”.

If the pope is assasinated, THEN will the world see the threat? What will it take? Do we really have to wait for a nuclear bomb to go off in New York? I think I’ll take a ride into the countryside on 11-9, 12-12, and any other suspicious dates. Got family in Iowa. Word of advice: get an emergency plan to go somewhere remote, like Iowa, with lots of canned food. As soon it starts going down, stay AWAY from the major cities. Especially New York and Washington DC. The reason I might flee is because Dallas is probably #5 (below NY, WDC, LA, & Chicago) on the list, and we have a few cells here. Granted the fallout might not be that bad 30 miles away, but rioting, lack of logistical routes for food, etc. Haha I’m not even a christian. I just realize the danger. People think the Nazi’s were bad? The islamo-nazis have a religious reason to blow themselves up in supermarkets full of THEIR OWN PEOPLE. I mean the 9/11 conspiracy theorists actually say the CIA is masterminding the attacks in Iraq, because it’s impossible to hold up the 9/11 conspiracy and say Islam isn’t evil and isn’t responsible, when the very same muslims are blowing up their own innocent muslims, to make a political point.

And if they’ll blow up their own people for political reasons, imagine what they’ll do to us. We’ve invited them in. I can’t go jogging without seeing 3 or 4 hijab-wearing women drive by. They’re everywhere, and they hate us. I’m not racist, I love arabs. Islam is a religion of hate, and needs to be stopped.

Technorati Tags: Islam, Muslims, Fatwah, Pope, Vatican, Italy, Pakistan, Osama bin Laden, Turkey, Caliphate, Terrorism, Jihad, International Islamic Front

According to CNN, Ban Ki-Moon was officially designated the successor to corrupt kleptocrat Kofi Annan. The report goes on to point out this was ironically hours after North Korea announced a nuclear test.

It’ll be interesting to see how Ban Ki-Moon will operate the place, certainly there could be no one worse than Kofi Annan (who accepted bribes from Saddam Hussein), so this definitely will be an improvement.

It also may play out interestingly on giving South Korea a more authoritative say on the North Korean conflict. South Korea just had a new conservative victory in elections with conservative seizing most governorships, but their executive branch leadership is still the left-of-center Uri Party. So you never know, he’s supposed to be a pure diplomat, which is a much preferred administrator than a conniving, corrupt politician like Kofi Annan.

Hopefully they will show some strong leadership on North Korea, and Iran. Or the UN’s gotta go. I am certainly glad the new right-wing Shinzo Abe is threatening withdrawing funding, among other things. So pressure is on. We need to do the same. It’s ironic that as SKorea was moving to regain wartime control, and essentially lessen their US alliance, Japan steps forward and says they want to strengthen it.

There’s some interesting diplomacy going on in Asia right now. It’s worth watching. For now, in my opinion, all eyes should be on China. They called North Korea’s actions brazen, but they haven’t yet taken action. Are they merely fooling us, and buying time to prepare their armies to take Taiwan and other regions. Or has their new fascist-capitalism pacified them?

Technorati Tags: North Korea, China, Taiwan, Japan, Ban Ki-Moon, Secretary General, UN, Nuclear Test, Kim Jong Il, Shinzo Abe

I was looking through the white house rss feeds and lo and behold what do I see? Discurso Radial del Presidente. First off, why can’t they just say “Radio Dicussion of the President - In Spanish” and secondly, SO MUCH FOR ENGLISH.

Why doesn’t Bush just give the weekly radio address in Spanish?

I mean seriously, Bush panders more to the mexican vote than the white vote. He sent Karl Rove to La Raza (the race), the Mexican KKK that advocates la reconquista “the reconquest” of the Southwest USA. Karl Rove called them the “great white hope”. This is foolish idiocy on the part of the administration thinking Mexicans will vote conservative. Granted Mexicans are SOCIALLY conservative, being anti-gay, anti-abortion catholics, but they are fiscally COMMUNIST, not just leftist, but avowed marxists. Not to mention the illegal immigrants disrespect our sovereignty, and over 60% of them believe this is their “rightful land”. 38% of illegal immigrants are on welfare! The vast majority of them leave medical bills, and education costs to the rest of the nation.

Between the illegal invasion, which is an ARMED invasion as many drug runners and mexican gangs cross with assault rifles, and muslim extremists in our own mist like the Nation of Islam, the largest US muslim group, which advocates killing all whites, we are simply doomed to wait for something extreme before the people will rally to stop this. We’ve been shoved tolerance down our throats no matter what evils are commited. We tolerate murderers like OJ and let him walk, we tolerate child rapists like MJ and let him walk, we tolerate Muslim extremists who spread propaganda, we tolerate gays, the same gays who account for 38% of child rapes but are only 2% of the population, we tolerate 19-year old intern-raping, liars, like Clinton, we tolerate evil.

You cannot “tolerate” evil.

Technorati Tags: Illegal immigration, White House, President Bush, Bush, Cheney, Mexican, immigration, invasion, war, tolerance

Looks to me like no one is over-reacting. This is good. No DoW (declaration of war) and no drastic measures. Now we have to rationally think of a way to deal with this threat.

I strongly suggest offering an american prostitute to Kim Jong Il in exchange for removing his nuclear weapons program. Seriously, this is just ONE MAN, not a goverment. Jong Il is a whiney babey. I mean this is the guy who’s son groomed to take control was arrested in Japan for a forged passport when he wanted to visit Tokyo Disneyland.

I mean seriously. He’s not a religious fanatic dictator bent on world destruction like Mahmoud Ahmadenijad, just a crazed, american-movie loving, sex-driven, paranoid despot.

As Team America: World Police satirizes, Kim is just “so ronery, so ronery, and sadly arone.” just a lonely crazy sex-driven paranoid dictator. He watches James Bond for pete’s sake, the same one where North Korea invades…

Heck just offer him a sneak peak at the newest James Bond and he’ll probably turn over the nuke program. Haha. Even a cornered mouse will attack the cat. You have to make sure he doesn’t get defensive.

At this point our best hope, since he’s in paranoid defensive mode, is probably China who could dissolve the NK government any time they want. We have to make the case to China that it is in their best interests to do so. And believe me, that will take some convincing, moreso of the PEOPLE of china, who have a kind of Han Nationalist fervor and the government which is really a capitalist driven ologarchy, might invade Taiwan themselves just to appease those very communist sentiments. So believe me, convincing Nazi China to dissolve Communist North Korea will take work. It also serves as a buffer zone between the US-”ally” SK and China in the same way eastern europe did for the Soviets. China also doesn’t want the ignorant farmers to realize they are national socialists, quite literally, with similar economic structure and han nationalists ethnically cleansing other minorities, and go beserk.

So the trick is to get nazi China to dissolve commy North Corea, without pissing off their large population of impoverished farmers who hold to the old communist ideals (that don’t work). Heck pissing off any minority over 5% is a coup risk because 5% is 55 million people.

China is the key. We need smart diplomacy to make it work. Or we could just give Kim that sneak peak at the new Bond. Or invite their whole family to Tokyo Disneyland. Crazy old dictator.

Technorati Tags: China, North Korea, threat, nuke, nuclear test, bomb, Nazi, Communist, Corea, Kim Jong Il, war, James Bond

Sometimes it seems like the end of the world is coming. Nuclear tests, an Iranian dictator calling for armageddon, rapid secularization of the world, a muslim coup in Thailand. Yeah that part never got in the news, the muslim general is “negotiating” with the terrorists. Won’t hear that part on CNN, because people might realize there are militant muslims in Asia too. Then people might realize there’s a RELIGIOUS war against the world, not JUST the west. Muslims are equal-opportunity haters, they hate buddhists, christians, hindus, everyone. They are 22% of the population yet account for 71% of all wars.

Religions Islam is at war with:

Buddhism: armed insurrection in Thailand.

Hindusim, Sikhism: Kashmir conflict with India.

Judaism: Intifada against Israel from both palestinian and lebanese fronts.

Christianity: Attacks on 9/11, 7-7, Madrid Bombings.

No religion will escape them. And if Kim Jong Il makes the mistake of selling a nuke to them, we’re doomed. Worse yet I think Pakistan is going to double-cross us, they have Osama in their borders and probably gave Al Qaeda a nuke to take us out with.

Al Qaeda is warning all Muslims to leave the US. Basically a nuclear-engineer muslim learned spanish, got surgery to look mexican, and crossed the border with a bomb or materials and know-how.

Technorati Tags: North Korea, Nuke, Nuclear Test, Kim Jong Il, Islam, terrorism, jihad, war, missile, Iran, Thailand Coup